- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Play (2026) vs Pova Curve
Motorola Moto G Play (2026) vs Tecno Pova Curve
What Moto G Play (2026) does better (3) and where Pova Curve wins (24) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display9.2
3.5Performance6.4
3.8Camera6.3
7.7Battery8.0
9.1Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Play (2026)Pova Curve
| Moto G Play (2026) | Pova Curve | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.3 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.6 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.5 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 188 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than Pova Curve?
- Memory card slotYes · Pova Curve: No
- eSIMYes · Pova Curve: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pova Curve: No
Why is Pova Curve better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- AnTuTu score402,175 vs 906,2402.3×
- Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Main camera32 MP vs 64 MP2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,074 vs 3,097+49%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G Play (2026): Yes
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+6%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Pixel density262 ppi vs 393 ppi+50%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,300 nits+30%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Pantone Tapestry | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 920 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 89.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 402,175 | 906,240 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,074 | 3,097 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 17.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | HIOS 15 |
