- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Play (2026) vs A5 Pro 4G
Motorola Moto G Play (2026) vs OPPO A5 Pro 4G
What Moto G Play (2026) does better (6) and where A5 Pro 4G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display5.3
3.8Camera4.6
7.7Battery8.1
9.1Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Play (2026)A5 Pro 4G
| Moto G Play (2026) | A5 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.8 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 194 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Play (2026) better than A5 Pro 4G?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- eSIMYes · A5 Pro 4G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · A5 Pro 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz+14%
- Process6 nm vs 11 nm+83%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is A5 Pro 4G better than Moto G Play (2026)?
- Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Main camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+12%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight202 g vs 194 g+4%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i or AGC DT-Star D+ |
| Colours | Pantone Tapestry | Mocha Brown (Mocha Chocolate), Olive Green (Moss Green), Silk Blue (Feather Blue) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 920 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 11 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 402,175 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,074 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 17.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | ColorOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 57 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
