- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Max vs Armor 22 Pro
Motorola Moto G Max vs UleFone Armor 22 Pro
What Moto G Max does better (13) and where Armor 22 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.4
6.8Camera5.4
8.1Battery8.2
4.4Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G MaxArmor 22 Pro
| Moto G Max | Armor 22 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.2 mm | 176.8 mm | −10.6 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 84.9 mm | −8.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 15 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 324 g | −111 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Max better than Armor 22 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,050 nits vs 450 nits2.3×
- 5GYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+6%
- Weight213 g vs 324 g+52%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 22 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 15 mm+74%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.2% vs 69.5%+24%
Why is Armor 22 Pro better than Moto G Max?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- NFCNo · Moto G Max: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- eSIMNo · Moto G Max: Yes
- Pixel density391 ppi vs 401 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 324 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 166.2 mm | 176.8 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 84.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Alaskan Blue, Malaga (Burgundy), Stargazer (Slate) | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,050 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.2% | 69.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 805,947 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,154 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 73 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
