- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G Max vs Pova 8
Motorola Moto G Max vs Tecno Pova 8
What Moto G Max does better (9) and where Pova 8 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display7.4
5.4Performance5.4
6.8Camera5.2
8.1Battery9.1
4.4Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G MaxPova 8
| Moto G Max | Pova 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.2 mm | 165.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 78.5 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 225 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Max better than Pova 8?
- AnTuTu score805,947 vs 666,199+21%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 8: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pova 8: No
- Weight213 g vs 225 g+6%
- Pixel density391 ppi vs 381 ppi+3%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.8 mm+2%
Why is Pova 8 better than Moto G Max?
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- NFCNo · Moto G Max: Yes
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+14%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,154 vs 2,914+35%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 166.2 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Alaskan Blue, Malaga (Burgundy), Stargazer (Slate) | Arc White, Graphite Black, Helios Orange, Echo Green, Bit White (India), Terminal Green (India) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,344 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 381 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,050 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 991 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.2% | 86.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 805,947 | 666,199 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,154 | 2,914 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 695 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.3 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
