- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G 5G vs Redmi Note 9S
Motorola Moto G 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
What Moto G 5G does better (8) and where Redmi Note 9S wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display4.2
3.1Performance2.7
6.5Camera6.5
5.0Battery5.8
5.6Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G 5GRedmi Note 9S
| Moto G 5G | Redmi Note 9S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 165.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.8 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 209 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G 5G better than Redmi Note 9S?
- AnTuTu score312,461 vs 254,000+23%
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 9S: No
- NFCYes · Redmi Note 9S: No
- Wired charging20 W vs 18 W+11%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,980 vs 1,785+11%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Charged in 30 min36% vs 30%+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9S better than Moto G 5G?
- Measured brightness484 nits vs 575 nits+19%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 8.8 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 484 nits | 575 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 84.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 312,461 | 254,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,980 | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 314 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 36% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.1 LUFS | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.72 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
