- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G 5G Plus vs Redmi K30 Ultra
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra
What Moto G 5G Plus does better (6) and where Redmi K30 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display7.2
6.5Camera7.8
5.0Battery4.2
7.1Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G 5G PlusRedmi K30 Ultra
| Moto G 5G Plus | Redmi K30 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.3 mm | 163.3 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 9.1 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 213 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G 5G Plus better than Redmi K30 Ultra?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K30 Ultra: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K30 Ultra: No
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Weight207 g vs 213 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is Redmi K30 Ultra better than Moto G 5G Plus?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Wired charging20 W vs 33 W+65%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+13%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness9.7 mm vs 9.1 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 168.3 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac | Moonlight White, Midnight Black, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 543 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 87.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 299,926 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,898 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 12 |
