- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G 5G Plus vs Galaxy A31
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A31
What Moto G 5G Plus does better (10) and where Galaxy A31 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display5.7
3.3Performance3.6
6.5Camera6.2
5.0Battery4.0
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G 5G PlusGalaxy A31
| Moto G 5G Plus | Galaxy A31 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.3 mm | 159.3 mm | +9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 73.1 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.6 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 185 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G 5G Plus better than Galaxy A31?
- AnTuTu score299,926 vs 151,815+98%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- 5GYes · Galaxy A31: No
- Wired charging20 W vs 15 W+33%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz+15%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+5%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/2+18%
- Loudspeaker loudness-28.4 LUFS vs -30.9 LUFS+-8%
Why is Galaxy A31 better than Moto G 5G Plus?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,898 vs 5,0962.7×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- Measured brightness543 nits vs 635 nits+17%
- Weight207 g vs 185 g+12%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Thickness9.7 mm vs 8.6 mm+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 168.3 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 73.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Red, Prism Crush White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 543 nits | 635 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 299,926 | 151,815 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,898 | 5,096 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.4 LUFS | -30.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.49 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 4.1 |
