- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G 5G Plus vs Find X2 Neo
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus vs OPPO Find X2 Neo
What Moto G 5G Plus does better (6) and where Find X2 Neo wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display6.2
3.3Performance3.6
6.5Camera8.1
5.0Battery3.1
7.1Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G 5G PlusFind X2 Neo
| Moto G 5G Plus | Find X2 Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.3 mm | 159.4 mm | +8.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 72.4 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 7.7 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 171 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G 5G Plus better than Find X2 Neo?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,025 mAh+24%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,898 vs 1,815+5%
- Memory card slotYes · Find X2 Neo: No
- Dual SIMYes · Find X2 Neo: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Find X2 Neo: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
Why is Find X2 Neo better than Moto G 5G Plus?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wired charging20 W vs 30 W+50%
- OLED panelNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G 5G Plus: Yes
- AnTuTu score299,926 vs 308,231+3%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Weight207 g vs 171 g+21%
- Rear cameras2 vs 42×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 171 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 168.3 mm | 159.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac | Moonlight Black, Starry Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 543 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 299,926 | 308,231 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,898 | 1,815 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,025 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.4 LUFS | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 7 |
