- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2026) vs Poco C75 5G
Motorola Moto G (2026) vs Xiaomi Poco C75 5G
What Moto G (2026) does better (12) and where Poco C75 5G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display5.9
3.6Performance3.4
5.9Camera4.1
7.9Battery6.3
9.1Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2026)Poco C75 5G
| Moto G (2026) | Poco C75 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 171.9 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 212 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2026) better than Poco C75 5G?
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme384 vs 1412.7×
- Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
- NFCYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- AnTuTu score417,027 vs 391,505+7%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 600 nits+67%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP6.4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,100 vs 2,014+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- eSIMYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Weight202 g vs 212 g+5%
Why is Poco C75 5G better than Moto G (2026)?
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Slipstream, Cattleya Orchid | Aqua Bliss, Enchanted Green, Silver Stardust |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 948 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM4635 Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 611 |
| AnTuTu score | 417,027 | 391,505 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,100 | 2,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | 141 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 16.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
