- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2026) vs LeNumero2 mini
Motorola Moto G (2026) vs Ordissimo LeNumero2 mini
What Moto G (2026) does better (14) and where LeNumero2 mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display2.4
5.9Camera2.4
9.1Features3.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2026)LeNumero2 mini
| Moto G (2026) | LeNumero2 mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 150 mm | +17.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 71 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 11 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 154 g | +48 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2026) better than LeNumero2 mini?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 2,000 mAh2.6×
- Main camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- 5GYes · LeNumero2 mini: No
- NFCYes · LeNumero2 mini: No
- RAM4 GB vs 3 GB+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP6.4×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 5.4″+23%
- CPU cores8 vs 42×
- eSIMYes · LeNumero2 mini: No
Why is LeNumero2 mini better than Moto G (2026)?
- Weight202 g vs 154 g+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 154 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 11 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 150 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 71 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Slipstream, Cattleya Orchid | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 5.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,440 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 948 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek MT8766B |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 417,027 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,100 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 2,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 16.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
