- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2026) vs A5 Pro 5G
Motorola Moto G (2026) vs OPPO A5 Pro 5G
What Moto G (2026) does better (4) and where A5 Pro 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display6.0
3.6Performance4.8
5.9Camera4.6
7.9Battery8.1
9.1Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2026)A5 Pro 5G
| Moto G (2026) | A5 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.8 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 194 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2026) better than A5 Pro 5G?
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,100 vs 2,010+4%
- eSIMYes · A5 Pro 5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · A5 Pro 5G: No
Why is A5 Pro 5G better than Moto G (2026)?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- AnTuTu score417,027 vs 596,993+43%
- Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+12%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Weight202 g vs 194 g+4%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Gorilla Glass 7i, Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Pantone: Slipstream, Cattleya Orchid | Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 948 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 86.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 417,027 | 596,993 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,100 | 2,010 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 384 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 16.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -21.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Proximity sensor, Gyroscope, Accelerometer, Ambient light sensor, Compass, Fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | ColorOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
