- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2025) vs Y200+
Motorola Moto G (2025) vs Vivo Y200+
What Moto G (2025) does better (9) and where Y200+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display6.2
7.3Camera4.1
5.5Battery8.2
7.4Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2025)Y200+
| Moto G (2025) | Y200+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.1 mm | 165.7 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 199 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2025) better than Y200+?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y200+: No
- NFCYes · Y200+: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 5 MP3.2×
- Memory card slotYes · Y200+: No
- eSIMYes · Y200+: No
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,000 nits+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight193 g vs 199 g+3%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 4.2+26%
Why is Y200+ better than Moto G (2025)?
- RAM4 GB vs 12 GB3×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging30 W vs 44 W+47%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 42%+11%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 167.1 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Forest Gray, Sapphire Blue | Dark Gray, Green, Apricot |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 1,608 px |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 526,717 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,023 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 42% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | OriginOS 4 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
