- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2023) vs Galaxy A34
Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy A34
What Moto G (2023) does better (4) and where Galaxy A34 wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display7.5
3.3Performance4.5
3.9Camera7.7
4.0Battery5.3
6.2Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2023)Galaxy A34
| Moto G (2023) | Galaxy A34 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 161.3 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 78.1 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2023) better than Galaxy A34?
- AnTuTu score499,266 vs 472,126+6%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A34: No
- Weight189 g vs 199 g+5%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A34 better than Moto G (2023)?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,000 nits2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- NFCNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,816 vs 2,316+28%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 390 ppi+44%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 161.3 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Ink Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,009 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 499,266 | 472,126 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,816 | 2,316 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 639 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 49% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.55 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
