- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto G (2022) vs Camon 19
Motorola Moto G (2022) vs Tecno Camon 19
What Moto G (2022) does better (6) and where Camon 19 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display4.8
5.2Camera6.1
3.5Battery4.6
5.0Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2022)Camon 19
| Moto G (2022) | Camon 19 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.4 mm | 166.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 198 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2022) better than Camon 19?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GYes · Camon 19: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 19 better than Moto G (2022)?
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- NFCNo · Moto G (2022): Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 395 ppi+46%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · Moto G (2022): Yes
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
- Weight204 g vs 198 g+3%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Thickness9.4 mm vs 8.3 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.4% vs 88.6%+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 165.4 mm | 166.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Moonlight Gray | Eco Black, Sea Salt White, Digital Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.4% | 88.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 306,873 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,403 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 13 |
