- android.gs
- Compare
- Moto E7 vs Redmi Note 9S
Motorola Moto E7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
What Moto E7 does better (2) and where Redmi Note 9S wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Display4.2
3.2Camera6.5
2.4Battery5.8
2.4Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto E7Redmi Note 9S
| Moto E7 | Redmi Note 9S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 165.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.7 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 209 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto E7 better than Redmi Note 9S?
- Weight180 g vs 209 g+16%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9S better than Moto E7?
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+25%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 395 ppi+47%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 16 MP3.2×
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto E7: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mineral Gray, Aqua Blue, Satin Coral | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 575 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 84.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 254,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 314 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.72 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
