- android.gs
- Compare
- G96 vs Narzo 80 Lite 5G
Motorola G96 vs Realme Narzo 80 Lite 5G
What G96 does better (21) and where Narzo 80 Lite 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display5.6
8.3Camera3.8
7.3Battery6.6
5.6Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
G96Narzo 80 Lite 5G
| G96 | Narzo 80 Lite 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 165.7 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.2 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 178 g | 197 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is G96 better than Narzo 80 Lite 5G?
- Wired charging30 W vs 15 W2×
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 625 nits2.6×
- Main camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- OLED panelYes · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 264 ppi+50%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
Why is Narzo 80 Lite 5G better than G96?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Memory card slotNo · G96: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · G96: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Pantone (Greener Pastures, Cattleya Orchid, Dresden Blue, Ashleigh Blue) | Crystal Purple, Onyx Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 625 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 794,638 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,887 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/3.1" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
