- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge vs Galaxy A52s 5G
Motorola Edge vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
What Edge does better (4) and where Galaxy A52s 5G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.4
3.1Performance5.6
7.6Camera8.7
3.0Battery3.2
8.1Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
EdgeGalaxy A52s 5G
| Edge | Galaxy A52s 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 159.9 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Width | 71.1 mm | 75.1 mm | −4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 189 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A52s 5G: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio95.9% vs 84.9%+13%
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than Edge?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,862 vs 11,0605.9×
- AnTuTu score305,989 vs 429,675+40%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Edge: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Edge: Yes
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 405 ppi+5%
- Selfie camera25 MP vs 32 MP+28%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 8.4 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 71.1 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Solar Black, Midnight Magenta | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 95.9% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 305,989 | 429,675 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,862 | 11,060 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 685 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 25 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.4 LUFS | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.88 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6 |
