- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge+ (2020) vs X50 5G (China)
Motorola Edge+ (2020) vs Realme X50 5G (China)
What Edge+ (2020) does better (14) and where X50 5G (China) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display6.7
9.2Camera7.4
5.4Battery3.1
8.7Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge+ (2020)X50 5G (China)
| Edge+ (2020) | X50 5G (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.8 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Width | 71.4 mm | 75.8 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 202 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge+ (2020) better than X50 5G (China)?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · X50 5G (China): No
- Optical stabilisationYes · X50 5G (China): No
- Wireless chargingYes · X50 5G (China): No
- Stereo speakersYes · X50 5G (China): No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+19%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X50 5G (China): No
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+18%
- Selfie camera25 MP vs 16 MP+56%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
Why is X50 5G (China) better than Edge+ (2020)?
- Wired charging18 W vs 30 W+67%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Dual SIMNo · Edge+ (2020): Yes
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 401 ppi+4%
- Thickness9.6 mm vs 8.9 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 71.4 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Smokey Sangria, Thunder Grey, Baltic Gray | Glacier, Polar |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 607 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 95.8% | 83.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 574,155 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,295 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.33" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 25 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 7 |
