How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Edge 70 Pro+ vs Poco X8 Pro Max

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

What Edge 70 Pro+ does better (10) and where Poco X8 Pro Max wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+
Motorola · 2026Edge 70 Pro+
9.5Score
10 advantages≈ $570
vs
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Xiaomi · 2026Poco X8 Pro Max
9.6Score
10 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
9.7Display9.4
8.7Performance9.0
9.6Camera8.8
9.2Battery9.7
8.4Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 70 Pro+Poco X8 Pro Max
75.6 × 162.77.277.9 × 162.98.2
Edge 70 Pro+Poco X8 Pro MaxDifference
Height162.7 mm162.9 mm−0.2 mm
Width75.6 mm77.9 mm−2.3 mm
Thickness7.2 mm8.2 mm−1 mm
Weight190 g218 g−28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 70 Pro+ better than Poco X8 Pro Max?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  2. Wireless chargingYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  3. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  4. Peak brightness5,200 nits vs 3,500 nits+49%
  5. Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
  6. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  7. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  8. Weight190 g vs 218 g+15%
  9. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  10. Thickness7.2 mm vs 8.2 mm+14%

Why is Poco X8 Pro Max better than Edge 70 Pro+?

  1. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 8,500 mAh+31%
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. AnTuTu score2,366,913 vs 2,445,108+3%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,900 vs 8,539+24%
  5. Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
  6. eSIMNo · Edge 70 Pro+: Yes
  7. CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 3.73 GHz+10%
  8. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
  10. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight190 g218 g
Thickness7.2 mm8.2 mm
Height162.7 mm162.9 mm
Width75.6 mm77.9 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackEco leatherPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursPantone: Stormy Sea (Green), Zinfandel (Red), Chicory Coffee (Wood)Black, White, Blue
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,272 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,772 px2,772 px
Pixel density450 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,200 nits3,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,114 nits
Screen-to-body ratio91.4%90.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8500 ExtremeMediatek Dimensity 9500s
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.4 GHz3.73 GHz
GPUMali-G720 MC8Immortalis-G925 MC11
AnTuTu score2,366,9132,445,108
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,9008,539
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,229
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.5
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.5×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh8,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—25.4 h
Wired charging90 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—62%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-20.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised3—
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—80 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare