android.gs
Compare
Edge 70 Max vs Reno15 FS

Motorola Edge 70 Max vs OPPO Reno15 FS

What Edge 70 Max does better (16) and where Reno15 FS wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2026Edge 70 Max

9.6Score

16 advantages≈ $840

Higher score

OPPO · 2026Reno15 FS

9.1Score

5 advantages≈ $920

9.6Display8.2

8.9Camera8.5

9.6Battery9.1

9.0Features9.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 70 MaxReno15 FS

	Edge 70 Max	Reno15 FS	Difference
Height	164 mm	158.2 mm	+5.8 mm
Width	77 mm	74.9 mm	+2.1 mm
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.2 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	221 g	189 g	+32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 70 Max better than Reno15 FS?

Peak brightness7,000 nits vs 1,400 nits5×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Wireless chargingYes · Reno15 FS: No
Battery capacity7,100 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+9%
CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+73%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
Pixel density510 ppi vs 397 ppi+28%
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Drop resistance classA vs C
Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+4%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%

Why is Reno15 FS better than Edge 70 Max?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Memory card slotNo · Edge 70 Max: Yes
Weight221 g vs 189 g+17%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Battery charge cycles1,200 vs 1,600+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 70 Max≈ $8409.6	OPPO Reno15 FS≈ $9209.1
Design
Weight	221 g	189 g
Thickness	8.3 mm	8.2 mm
Height	164 mm	158.2 mm
Width	77 mm	74.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass+
Colours	Pantone: Onyx Black (Dark Shadow), Sage Green (Aqua Gray), Glacier Blue (Ice Melt)	Blue, Navy Blue
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.6″
Panel	LTPO AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	3,168 px	2,372 px
Pixel density	510 ppi	397 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	7,000 nits	1,400 nits
Measured brightness	1,571 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.5%	88.6%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	3 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.8 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 829	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	3,057,494	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	9,315	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	5,324	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,100 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	19.5 h	—
Wired charging	90 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	71%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	25 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	6	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.3 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	ColorOS 16
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	A	A
Battery charge cycles	1,200	1,600
Endurance per cycle	75 h	68 h
Repairability class	B	B
Drop resistance class	A	C