- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 60s vs Aquos R9 pro
Motorola Edge 60s vs Sharp Aquos R9 pro
What Edge 60s does better (9) and where Aquos R9 pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.3
8.3Camera9.3
8.4Battery6.4
8.9Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 60sAquos R9 pro
| Edge 60s | Aquos R9 pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 162 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 78 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.3 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 220 g | −40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 60s better than Aquos R9 pro?
- Wired charging68 W vs 32 W2.1×
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,000 nits2.2×
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Weight180 g vs 220 g+22%
- Memory card slotYes · Aquos R9 pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R9 pro: No
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 9.3 mm+13%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.1% vs 87.2%+4%
Why is Aquos R9 pro better than Edge 60s?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Edge 60s: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Edge 60s: Yes
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMNo · Edge 60s: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz+15%
- Pixel density446 ppi vs 513 ppi+15%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+57%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,440 px+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 78 mm |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Slipstream, Amazonite, Zephyr, Mykonos Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 513 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 87.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 735 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/0.98" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.8× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 32 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
