- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 60 Stylus vs Galaxy F36
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus vs Samsung Galaxy F36
What Edge 60 Stylus does better (13) and where Galaxy F36 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display8.1
8.3Camera8.0
7.6Battery5.3
8.4Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 60 StylusGalaxy F36
| Edge 60 Stylus | Galaxy F36 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 164.4 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.9 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 197 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 60 Stylus better than Galaxy F36?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy F36: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F36: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- eSIMYes · Galaxy F36: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy F36: No
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 387 ppi+15%
- Weight191 g vs 197 g+3%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Galaxy F36 better than Edge 60 Stylus?
- Major OS updates promised2 vs 63×
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.7 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web | Luxe Violet, Coral Red, Onyx Black |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 85.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 848,851 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,952 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.38 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | 6 |
