android.gs
Compare
Edge 60 Pro vs S50 Pro mini

Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Vivo S50 Pro mini

What Edge 60 Pro does better (5) and where S50 Pro mini wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Edge 60 Pro

9.3Score

5 advantages≈ $460

Vivo · 2025S50 Pro mini

9.5Score

11 advantages≈ $490

Higher score

9.2Display7.6

8.1Performance9.4

9.1Camera9.4

8.9Battery9.5

8.8Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 60 ProS50 Pro mini

	Edge 60 Pro	S50 Pro mini	Difference
Height	160.7 mm	150.8 mm	+9.9 mm
Width	73.1 mm	71.8 mm	+1.3 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	8 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	186 g	191 g	−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 60 Pro better than S50 Pro mini?

eSIMYes · S50 Pro mini: No
Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+6%
Charged in 30 min81% vs 48%+69%
Weight186 g vs 191 g+3%
Screen-to-body ratio92.2% vs 90.2%+2%

Why is S50 Pro mini better than Edge 60 Pro?

AnTuTu score1,356,227 vs 2,974,2012.2×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,476 vs 9,4012.1×
Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
Wireless charging power15 W vs 40 W2.7×
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 3.8 GHz+13%
Pixel density444 ppi vs 461 ppi+4%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 60 Pro≈ $4609.3	Vivo S50 Pro mini≈ $4909.5
Design
Weight	186 g	191 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	8 mm
Height	160.7 mm	150.8 mm
Width	73.1 mm	71.8 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	—
Colours	Pantone: Shadow, Dazzling Blue, Sparkling Grape	Black, Purple, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.3″
Panel	P-OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,220 px	1,216 px
Resolution (height)	2,712 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	444 ppi	461 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,595 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	92.2%	90.2%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme	Qualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.35 GHz	3.8 GHz
GPU	Mali G615-MC6	Adreno 829
AnTuTu score	1,356,227	2,974,201
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,476	9,401
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,221	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	3×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	16.2 h	—
Wired charging	90 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	81%	48%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	40 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.9 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	68 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	A	—