android.gs
Compare
Edge 60 Pro vs Reno15 Pro (China)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs OPPO Reno15 Pro (China)

What Edge 60 Pro does better (6) and where Reno15 Pro (China) wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2025Edge 60 Pro

9.3Score

6 advantages≈ $460

OPPO · 2025Reno15 Pro (China)

9.5Score

8 advantages≈ $490

Higher score

9.2Display9.0

9.1Camera9.7

8.9Battery9.6

8.8Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 60 ProReno15 Pro (China)

	Edge 60 Pro	Reno15 Pro (China)	Difference
Height	160.7 mm	161.2 mm	−0.5 mm
Width	73.1 mm	76.5 mm	−3.4 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	7.7 mm	+0.5 mm
Weight	186 g	205 g	−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 60 Pro better than Reno15 Pro (China)?

Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,600 nits+25%
eSIMYes · Reno15 Pro (China): No
Weight186 g vs 205 g+10%
CPU frequency3.35 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+3%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%

Why is Reno15 Pro (China) better than Edge 60 Pro?

Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Optical zoom3× vs 3.5×+17%
Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%
Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,272 px+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 60 Pro≈ $4609.3	OPPO Reno15 Pro (China)≈ $4909.5
Design
Weight	186 g	205 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	7.7 mm
Height	160.7 mm	161.2 mm
Width	73.1 mm	76.5 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Reinforced glass
Colours	Pantone: Shadow, Dazzling Blue, Sparkling Grape	Dusk Brown, Gold, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	P-OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,220 px	1,272 px
Resolution (height)	2,712 px	2,772 px
Pixel density	444 ppi	450 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	3,600 nits
Measured brightness	1,595 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	92.2%	91.2%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme	Mediatek Dimensity 8450
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.35 GHz	3.25 GHz
GPU	Mali G615-MC6	Mali-G720 MC7
AnTuTu score	1,356,227	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,476	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,221	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	200 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	3.5×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	—
Active use (test)	16.2 h	—
Wired charging	90 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	81%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	50 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.9 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	ColorOS 16
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	68 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	A	—