How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Edge 60 Neo vs Poco F7

Motorola Edge 60 Neo vs Xiaomi Poco F7

What Edge 60 Neo does better (9) and where Poco F7 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Motorola · 2025Edge 60 Neo
8.9Score
9 advantages≈ $630
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7
9.3Score
15 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
8.0Display9.4
7.0Performance8.5
9.0Camera8.8
7.6Battery8.6
9.6Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 60 NeoPoco F7
71.2 × 154.18.177.9 × 163.18.2
Edge 60 NeoPoco F7Difference
Height154.1 mm163.1 mm−9 mm
Width71.2 mm77.9 mm−6.7 mm
Thickness8.1 mm8.2 mm−0.1 mm
Weight174 g216 g−41 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 60 Neo better than Poco F7?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F7: No
  2. Wireless chargingYes · Poco F7: No
  3. Weight174 g vs 216 g+24%
  4. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F7: No
  5. eSIMYes · Poco F7: No
  6. Energy classA vs B
  7. Pixel density460 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%
  8. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
  9. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is Poco F7 better than Edge 60 Neo?

  1. AnTuTu score964,392 vs 2,024,7512.1×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,051 vs 6,4022.1×
  3. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+30%
  4. Wired charging68 W vs 90 W+32%
  5. Measured brightness1,114 nits vs 1,525 nits+37%
  6. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+23%
  7. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  8. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  9. Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+7%
  10. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+7%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
  12. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F7Xiaomi Poco F7≈ $6209.3
Design
Weight174 g216 g
Thickness8.1 mm8.2 mm
Height154.1 mm163.1 mm
Width71.2 mm77.9 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackEco leatherGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursPantone: Latte, Frostbite, Poinciana, GrisailleBlack, White, Cyber Silver
Display
Screen size6.4″6.8″
PanelLTPO P-OLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,200 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,670 px2,772 px
Pixel density460 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness1,114 nits1,525 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.9%90.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.21 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Adreno 825
AnTuTu score964,3922,024,751
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,0516,402
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,476
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.5
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—14.8 h
Wired charging68 W90 W
Charged in 30 min76%80%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UIHyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Energy classAB
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—64 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare