How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Edge 50 vs Camon 30

Motorola Edge 50 vs Tecno Camon 30

What Edge 50 does better (22) and where Camon 30 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Edge 50
Motorola · 2024Edge 50
8.6Score
22 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Tecno Camon 30
Tecno · 2024Camon 30
7.6Score
4 advantages
8.7Display8.6
6.3Performance5.0
9.0Camera7.8
5.0Battery7.3
9.6Features4.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 50Camon 30
72.4 × 160.87.875.3 × 165.37.7
Edge 50Camon 30Difference
Height160.8 mm165.3 mm−4.5 mm
Width72.4 mm75.3 mm−2.9 mm
Thickness7.8 mm7.7 mm+0.1 mm
Weight180 g198 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 50 better than Camon 30?

  1. Major OS updates promised5 vs 22.5×
  2. AnTuTu score722,062 vs 591,209+22%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,940 vs 1,976+49%
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Telephoto cameraYes · Camon 30: No
  6. Wireless chargingYes · Camon 30: No
  7. 5GYes · Camon 30: No
  8. Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30: No
  9. Storage (base)256 GB vs 8 GB32×
  10. Rear cameras3 vs 13×
  11. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30: No
  12. Max video4K vs 1080p

Why is Camon 30 better than Edge 50?

  1. Wired charging68 W vs 70 W+3%
  2. Memory card slotNo · Edge 50: Yes
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge 50: Yes
  4. Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Edge 50Motorola Edge 50≈ $2808.6
Design
Weight180 g198 g
Thickness7.8 mm7.7 mm
Height160.8 mm165.3 mm
Width72.4 mm75.3 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackEco leatherGlass
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5—
ColoursKoala Gray, Jungle Green, Peach FuzzIceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelP-OLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,220 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,712 px2,436 px
Pixel density446 ppi393 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits—
Measured brightness1,416 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio92.2%88.3%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AEMediatek Helio G99 Ultimate
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 644Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score722,062591,209
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,9401,976
3DMark Wild Life Extreme823—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB8 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.57"
Rear cameras31
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Selfie camera32 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)9.9 h—
Wired charging68 W70 W
Charged in 30 min—67%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesNo
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-23.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UIHIOS 16
Major OS updates promised52
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle46 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare