- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 50 vs F27
Motorola Edge 50 vs OPPO F27
What Edge 50 does better (20) and where F27 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 50F27
| Edge 50 | F27 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.8 mm | 163 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 75.8 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 187 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 50 better than F27?
- Wired charging68 W vs 45 W+51%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · F27: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · F27: No
- Wireless chargingYes · F27: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · F27: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · F27: No
Why is F27 better than Edge 50?
- Peak brightness1,600 nits vs 2,100 nits+31%
- Memory card slotNo · Edge 50: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 160.8 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Koala Gray, Jungle Green, Peach Fuzz | Emerald Green, Amber Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,600 nits | 2,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,416 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.2% | 86.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 722,062 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,940 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 823 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 9.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | ColorOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 46 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
