- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 50 Ultra vs Moto X50 Ultra
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Motorola Moto X50 Ultra
What Edge 50 Ultra does better (2) and where Moto X50 Ultra wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.5
9.4Camera9.4
6.8Battery7.7
8.5Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 50 UltraMoto X50 Ultra
| Edge 50 Ultra | Moto X50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm | = |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 72.4 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.6 mm | = |
| Weight | 197 g | 197 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 50 Ultra better than Moto X50 Ultra?
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- eSIMYes · Moto X50 Ultra: No
Why is Moto X50 Ultra better than Edge 50 Ultra?
Moto X50 Ultra has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 72.4 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 444 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,500 nits | 2,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,473 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.1% | 92.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,485,409 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,051 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,258 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 12.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 125 W | 125 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2 | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
