android.gs
Compare
Edge 50 Neo vs F27 Pro+

Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs OPPO F27 Pro+

What Edge 50 Neo does better (18) and where F27 Pro+ wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Edge 50 Neo

8.6Score

18 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

OPPO · 2024F27 Pro+

7.8Score

7 advantages≈ $400

8.1Display7.7

9.0Camera5.9

5.7Battery7.2

9.6Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 50 NeoF27 Pro+

	Edge 50 Neo	F27 Pro+	Difference
Height	154.1 mm	162.7 mm	−8.6 mm
Width	71.2 mm	74.3 mm	−3.1 mm
Thickness	8.1 mm	7.9 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	171 g	177 g	−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 50 Neo better than F27 Pro+?

Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 950 nits3.2×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · F27 Pro+: No
Telephoto cameraYes · F27 Pro+: No
Wireless chargingYes · F27 Pro+: No
NFCYes · F27 Pro+: No
Stereo speakersYes · F27 Pro+: No
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · F27 Pro+: No

Why is F27 Pro+ better than Edge 50 Neo?

Battery capacity4,310 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.9 mm+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 50 Neo≈ $3808.6	OPPO F27 Pro+≈ $4007.8
Design
Weight	171 g	177 g
Thickness	8.1 mm	7.9 mm
Height	154.1 mm	162.7 mm
Width	71.2 mm	74.3 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Eco leather	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP69
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx9
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Colours	Nautical Blue, Latte, Grisaille, Poinciana, Mocha Mousse	Blue
Display
Screen size	6.4″	6.7″
Panel	LTPO P-OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,200 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,670 px	2,412 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	394 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	950 nits
Measured brightness	1,437 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	88.9%	89.4%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300	Mediatek Dimensity 7050
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G68 MC4
AnTuTu score	696,931	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,959	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	855	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.55"	1/2.0"
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,310 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Active use (test)	13.5 h	—
Wired charging	68 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	—	84%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.97 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	ColorOS 14
Major OS updates promised	5	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	51 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	B	—