android.gs
Compare
Edge 50 Fusion vs Armor 27T

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion vs UleFone Armor 27T

What Edge 50 Fusion does better (16) and where Armor 27T wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Edge 50 Fusion

8.2Score

16 advantages≈ $480

Higher score

UleFone · 2024Armor 27T

7.9Score

5 advantages≈ $450

8.4Display7.2

8.3Camera5.9

6.2Battery9.1

8.4Features6.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 50 FusionArmor 27T

	Edge 50 Fusion	Armor 27T	Difference
Height	161.9 mm	182.8 mm	−20.9 mm
Width	73.1 mm	86.8 mm	−13.7 mm
Thickness	7.9 mm	18.5 mm	−10.6 mm
Weight	175 g	441 g	−266 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 50 Fusion better than Armor 27T?

Wired charging68 W vs 33 W2.1×
Weight175 g vs 441 g2.5×
OLED panelYes · Armor 27T: No
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 27T: No
5GYes · Armor 27T: No
Stereo speakersYes · Armor 27T: No
Thickness7.9 mm vs 18.5 mm2.3×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 27T: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Armor 27T: No
eSIMYes · Armor 27T: No

Why is Armor 27T better than Edge 50 Fusion?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 10,600 mAh2.1×
Wireless chargingNo · Edge 50 Fusion: Yes
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotNo · Edge 50 Fusion: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge 50 Fusion: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 50 Fusion≈ $4808.2	UleFone Armor 27T≈ $4507.9
Design
Weight	175 g	441 g
Thickness	7.9 mm	18.5 mm
Height	161.9 mm	182.8 mm
Width	73.1 mm	86.8 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Silicone polymer	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink	Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	P-OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,460 px
Pixel density	393 ppi	396 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,600 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,322 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	91.6%	68.8%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 - International	Mediatek Helio G99
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	520,319	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,885	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	793	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/2
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	10,600 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	12.7 h	—
Wired charging	68 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	100%	—
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.2 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Hello UI	—
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	112 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A