- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 40 vs Galaxy F34
Motorola Edge 40 vs Samsung Galaxy F34
What Edge 40 does better (15) and where Galaxy F34 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display7.5
8.3Camera8.0
6.2Battery7.5
8.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 40Galaxy F34
| Edge 40 | Galaxy F34 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.4 mm | 161.7 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 77.2 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.8 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 208 g | −41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 40 better than Galaxy F34?
- Wired charging68 W vs 25 W2.7×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy F34: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F34: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Weight167 g vs 208 g+25%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Galaxy F34: No
- eSIMYes · Galaxy F34: No
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 1,000 nits+20%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.8+29%
Why is Galaxy F34 better than Edge 40?
- Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+36%
- Memory card slotNo · Edge 40: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge 40: Yes
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 158.4 mm | 161.7 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta | Electric Black, Mystic Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,043 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 83.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Exynos 1280 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 |
| AnTuTu score | 688,347 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,320 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,260 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.89 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI 5.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
