android.gs
Compare
Edge 40 Pro vs 13T

Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T

What Edge 40 Pro does better (17) and where 13T wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2023Edge 40 Pro

9.0Score

17 advantages≈ $250

Higher score

Xiaomi · 202313T

8.8Score

7 advantages≈ $250

8.6Display9.4

7.9Performance7.1

9.1Camera8.2

7.1Battery5.7

9.0Features9.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 40 Pro13T

	Edge 40 Pro	13T	Difference
Height	161.2 mm	162.2 mm	−1 mm
Width	74 mm	75.7 mm	−1.7 mm
Thickness	8.6 mm	8.5 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	199 g	193 g	+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 40 Pro better than 13T?

AnTuTu score1,273,764 vs 825,858+54%
Wired charging125 W vs 67 W+87%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Wireless chargingYes · 13T: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,896 vs 3,755+30%
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
Selfie camera60 MP vs 20 MP3×
Charged in 30 min250% vs 71%3.5×
Max video8K vs 4K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
4K selfie videoYes · 13T: No
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+3%

Why is 13T better than Edge 40 Pro?

Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 2,600 nits2×
Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
Measured brightness1,050 nits vs 1,264 nits+20%
Pixel density394 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
Weight199 g vs 193 g+3%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,220 px+13%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 40 Pro≈ $2509.0	Xiaomi 13T≈ $2508.8
Design
Weight	199 g	193 g
Thickness	8.6 mm	8.5 mm
Height	161.2 mm	162.2 mm
Width	74 mm	75.7 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue	Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	2,600 nits
Measured brightness	1,050 nits	1,264 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.5%	87.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	3.1 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Mali-G610 MC6
AnTuTu score	1,273,764	825,858
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,896	3,755
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,631	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.55"	1/1.28"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2×	2×
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	60 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,600 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	12.4 h
Wired charging	125 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	250%	71%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.6 LUFS	-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	My UX	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	3	4