- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 40 Neo vs Pova 5 Pro
Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Tecno Pova 5 Pro
What Edge 40 Neo does better (21) and where Pova 5 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display6.5
5.1Performance3.8
8.3Camera5.5
4.8Battery7.3
8.4Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 40 NeoPova 5 Pro
| Edge 40 Neo | Pova 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.6 mm | 168.5 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 76.5 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 212 g | −42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 40 Neo better than Pova 5 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 580 nits2.2×
- AnTuTu score511,077 vs 389,037+31%
- Measured brightness1,073 nits vs 509 nits2.1×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Pova 5 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 5 Pro: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,563 vs 1,884+36%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight170 g vs 212 g+25%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 5 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
Why is Pova 5 Pro better than Edge 40 Neo?
- Memory card slotNo · Edge 40 Neo: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge 40 Neo: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 159.6 mm | 168.5 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz | Dark Illusion, Silver Fantasy, Free Fire Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 580 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,073 nits | 509 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 84.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 511,077 | 389,037 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,563 | 1,884 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 10.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.8 LUFS | -25.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
