- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge 30 vs Galaxy M23
Motorola Edge 30 vs Samsung Galaxy M23
What Edge 30 does better (21) and where Galaxy M23 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display5.8
5.9Performance3.8
8.3Camera6.3
3.2Battery5.3
6.8Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 30Galaxy M23
| Edge 30 | Galaxy M23 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.4 mm | 165.5 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.4 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 198 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 30 better than Galaxy M23?
- AnTuTu score895,081 vs 566,483+58%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,795 vs 1,882+49%
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy M23: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy M23: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M23: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Weight155 g vs 198 g+28%
- Charged in 30 min68% vs 32%2.1×
Why is Galaxy M23 better than Edge 30?
- Battery capacity4,020 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+24%
- Memory card slotNo · Edge 30: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge 30: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 525 nits+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 155 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 159.4 mm | 165.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Meteor Grey, Supermoon Silver, Aurora Green | Deep Green, Light Blue, Orange Copper |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 525 nits |
| Measured brightness | 627 nits | 521 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.2% | 82.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 895,081 | 566,483 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,795 | 1,882 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 330 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,020 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | 32% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.78 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | One UI 5.1 |
