How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Edge 30 Ultra vs Redmi Note 12 Pro+

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+

What Edge 30 Ultra does better (23) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro+ wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Motorola · 2022Edge 30 Ultra
8.9Score
23 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
Xiaomi · 2022Redmi Note 12 Pro+
7.6Score
6 advantages≈ $210
8.4Display7.5
7.7Performance4.9
9.3Camera8.6
7.9Battery5.3
6.8Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 30 UltraRedmi Note 12 Pro+
73.5 × 161.88.476 × 162.98.9
Edge 30 UltraRedmi Note 12 Pro+Difference
Height161.8 mm162.9 mm−1.1 mm
Width73.5 mm76 mm−2.5 mm
Thickness8.4 mm8.9 mm−0.5 mm
Weight198 g208 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 30 Ultra better than Redmi Note 12 Pro+?

  1. AnTuTu score1,074,722 vs 498,7102.2×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,265 vs 2,208+93%
  3. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,529 vs 6292.4×
  4. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro+: No
  6. Wireless chargingYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro+: No
  7. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  8. Selfie camera60 MP vs 16 MP3.8×
  9. Peak brightness1,250 nits vs 900 nits+39%
  10. Wired charging125 W vs 120 W+4%
  11. CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+23%
  12. Max video8K vs 4K

Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro+ better than Edge 30 Ultra?

  1. Battery capacity4,610 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+8%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx3+50%
  3. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge 30 Ultra: Yes
  5. Charged in 30 min95% vs 158%+66%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight198 g208 g
Thickness8.4 mm8.9 mm
Height161.8 mm162.9 mm
Width73.5 mm76 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP52IP53
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2IPx3
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursInterstellar Black, Starlight WhiteArctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelP-OLEDOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,400 px
Pixel density395 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,250 nits900 nits
Measured brightness1,047 nits990 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%86.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Mediatek Dimensity 1080
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.19 GHz2.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G68 MC4
AnTuTu score1,074,722498,710
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,2652,208
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,529629
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.22"1/1.4"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera60 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,610 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—10.6 h
Wired charging125 W120 W
Charged in 30 min95%158%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.12
Video outputYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-23.4 LUFS-26.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HyperOS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare