How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Edge 30 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo9

What Edge 30 Ultra does better (8) and where iQOO Neo9 wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Motorola · 2022Edge 30 Ultra
8.9Score
8 advantages≈ $300
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo9
Vivo · 2023iQOO Neo9
9.3Score
14 advantages≈ $310
Higher score
8.4Display9.2
7.7Performance8.6
9.3Camera8.9
7.9Battery8.6
6.8Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 30 UltraiQOO Neo9
73.5 × 161.88.475.7 × 163.58
Edge 30 UltraiQOO Neo9Difference
Height161.8 mm163.5 mm−1.7 mm
Width73.5 mm75.7 mm−2.2 mm
Thickness8.4 mm8 mm+0.4 mm
Weight198 g190 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 30 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9: No
  4. Selfie camera60 MP vs 16 MP3.8×
  5. Wired charging125 W vs 120 W+4%
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9: No
  7. USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
  8. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is iQOO Neo9 better than Edge 30 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score1,074,722 vs 1,819,685+69%
  2. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,529 vs 3,6412.4×
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Battery capacity4,610 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+12%
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,265 vs 5,692+33%
  6. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  7. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  8. Pixel density395 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
  9. Peak brightness1,250 nits vs 1,400 nits+12%
  10. Weight198 g vs 190 g+4%
  11. Charged in 30 min95% vs 133%+40%
  12. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO Neo9Vivo iQOO Neo9≈ $3109.3
Design
Weight198 g190 g
Thickness8.4 mm8 mm
Height161.8 mm163.5 mm
Width73.5 mm75.7 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP52—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5—
ColoursInterstellar Black, Starlight WhiteBlack, Blue, Red
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelP-OLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,800 px
Pixel density395 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness1,250 nits1,400 nits
Measured brightness1,047 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.19 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,074,7221,819,685
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,2655,692
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,5293,641
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.22"1/1.49"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera60 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,610 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging125 W120 W
Charged in 30 min95%133%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.12
Video outputYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-23.4 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 12Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—OriginOS 4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare