- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge (2026) vs Aquos R11
Motorola Edge (2026) vs Sharp Aquos R11
What Edge (2026) does better (9) and where Aquos R11 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display8.6
9.1Camera9.2
7.6Battery7.4
9.6Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge (2026)Aquos R11
| Edge (2026) | Aquos R11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152.3 mm | 156 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 74 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 160 g | 195 g | −34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge (2026) better than Aquos R11?
- Wired charging68 W vs 36 W+89%
- Wireless chargingYes · Aquos R11: No
- Peak brightness5,200 nits vs 3,600 nits+44%
- Weight160 g vs 195 g+21%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R11: No
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 396 ppi+16%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+24%
- Resolution (width)1,216 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Aquos R11 better than Edge (2026)?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+23%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.5″+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 160 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 152.3 mm | 156 mm |
| Width | 72 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Eco leather | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Pantone: Martini Olive | Navy, Ivory, Terracotta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,216 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,200 nits | 3,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7450 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | 979,808 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,080 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 36 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 77% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
