- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge (2025) vs Y400 4G
Motorola Edge (2025) vs Vivo Y400 4G
What Edge (2025) does better (19) and where Y400 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.4
9.1Camera4.6
8.4Battery8.2
9.6Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge (2025)Y400 4G
| Edge (2025) | Y400 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 162.3 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 75.3 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 196 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge (2025) better than Y400 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- Wired charging68 W vs 44 W+55%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y400 4G: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Y400 4G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Y400 4G: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Y400 4G: No
- eSIMYes · Y400 4G: No
Why is Y400 4G better than Edge (2025)?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+15%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Deep Forest | Purple Twilight, Tropical Green (Dynamic Green), Pearl White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 87.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 981,681 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,070 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Funtouch 15 |
