- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge (2025) vs V50 Lite
Motorola Edge (2025) vs Vivo V50 Lite
What Edge (2025) does better (16) and where V50 Lite wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.6
9.1Camera7.3
8.4Battery9.2
9.6Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge (2025)V50 Lite
| Edge (2025) | V50 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 163.8 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 76.3 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 197 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge (2025) better than V50 Lite?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- Optical stabilisationYes · V50 Lite: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · V50 Lite: No
- Wireless chargingYes · V50 Lite: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- 4K selfie videoYes · V50 Lite: No
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 388 ppi+14%
- Weight181 g vs 197 g+9%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+8%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is V50 Lite better than Edge (2025)?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wired charging68 W vs 90 W+32%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Deep Forest | Phantom Black, Titanium Gold, Fantasy Purple, Silk Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 88.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 981,681 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,070 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Funtouch 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 61 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Edge (2025)vsTecno Pova 7 Ultra9.19.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)vsMotorola Edge (2025)9.39.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)vsMotorola Edge (2025)9.19.1
vs
Motorola Edge (2025)vsMotorola Edge (2024)9.18.8
vs
Motorola Edge (2025)vsMotorola Edge (2023)9.18.4
vs
Vivo V50 LitevsTecno Camon 40 Pro8.98.6
