- android.gs
- Compare
- Edge (2025) vs Armor X16
Motorola Edge (2025) vs UleFone Armor X16
What Edge (2025) does better (27) and where Armor X16 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display5.8
9.1Camera5.0
8.4Battery8.6
9.6Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge (2025)Armor X16
| Edge (2025) | Armor X16 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 173.8 mm | −12.6 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 83.4 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 18 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 395 g | −214 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge (2025) better than Armor X16?
- Wired charging68 W vs 33 W2.1×
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 910 nits4.9×
- Weight181 g vs 395 g2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Armor X16: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor X16: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Armor X16: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Armor X16: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor X16: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 269 ppi+65%
- Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
Why is Armor X16 better than Edge (2025)?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 10,360 mAh+99%
- Memory card slotNo · Edge (2025): Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Edge (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 395 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 173.8 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 83.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Deep Forest | Wasteland Shadow/Sand Dune |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 910 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 71.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra | Mediatek Helio G91 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 981,681 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,070 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 10,360 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 117 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
