- android.gs
- Compare
- 22 vs Civi 5 Pro
Meizu 22 vs Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro
What 22 does better (6) and where Civi 5 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display8.7
9.0Performance8.8
9.4Camera9.2
9.4Battery8.6
8.1Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
22Civi 5 Pro
| 22 | Civi 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152 mm | 157 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 73.2 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 181 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 22 better than Civi 5 Pro?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Civi 5 Pro: No
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+88%
- AnTuTu score2,454,886 vs 2,375,195+3%
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2.5×+20%
Why is Civi 5 Pro better than 22?
- Battery capacity5,510 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Weight190 g vs 181 g+5%
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.6″+4%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.6+6%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,236 px+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 152 mm | 157 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Pink | Gray, Rose Gold, Violet, White, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,236 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 465 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,454,886 | 2,375,195 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,903 | 6,890 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,510 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0/3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme AIOS 2 | HyperOS 2 |
