- android.gs
- Compare
- 22 vs Y400
Meizu 22 vs Vivo Y400
What 22 does better (20) and where Y400 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
22Y400
| 22 | Y400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152 mm | 162.3 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 75.3 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 197 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 22 better than Y400?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,800 nits3.3×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y400: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Y400: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Y400: No
- NFCYes · Y400: No
- CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+46%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
Why is Y400 better than 22?
- Battery capacity5,510 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Memory card slotNo · 22: Yes
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.9 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 152 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, White, Pink | Glam White, Olive Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 465 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 87.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,454,886 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,903 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,510 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0/3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme AIOS 2 | Funtouch 15 |
