- android.gs
- Compare
- 22 vs S50
Meizu 22 vs Vivo S50
What 22 does better (8) and where S50 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
22S50
| 22 | S50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152 mm | 157.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 74.3 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 196 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 22 better than S50?
- AnTuTu score2,454,886 vs 1,794,400+37%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · S50: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,903 vs 5,710+21%
- CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
- Weight190 g vs 196 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is S50 better than 22?
- Battery capacity5,510 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+18%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.6″+5%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+8%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,260 px+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio88.7% vs 90.7%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 152 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, White, Pink | Black, Blue, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,750 px |
| Pixel density | 465 ppi | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 90.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,454,886 | 1,794,400 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,903 | 5,710 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,510 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 48% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0/3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme AIOS 2 | OriginOS 6 |
