- android.gs
- Compare
- 22 vs Reno 15c
Meizu 22 vs OPPO Reno 15c
What 22 does better (10) and where Reno 15c wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
22Reno 15c
| 22 | Reno 15c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 152 mm | 158 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 74.8 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 197 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 22 better than Reno 15c?
- AnTuTu score2,454,886 vs 1,307,414+88%
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,200 nits5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,903 vs 3,958+74%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Reno 15c: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+15%
- Weight190 g vs 197 g+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Reno 15c better than 22?
- Battery capacity5,510 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+18%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Optical zoom3× vs 3.5×+17%
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.6″+5%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.8 mm+5%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,256 px+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 152 mm | 158 mm |
| Width | 71 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Pink | Dark blue, Aurora blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,256 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,670 px | 2,760 px |
| Pixel density | 465 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 89.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,454,886 | 1,307,414 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,903 | 3,958 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,510 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 71% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0/3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme AIOS 2 | ColorOS 16 |
