How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. 22 vs Phone (3a)

Meizu 22 vs Nothing Phone (3a)

What 22 does better (21) and where Phone (3a) wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Meizu 22
Meizu · 202522
9.4Score
21 advantages≈ $390
Higher score
vs
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing · 2025Phone (3a)
8.3Score
1 advantage≈ $390
8.3Display8.5
9.0Performance6.8
9.4Camera8.3
9.4Battery6.4
8.1Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

22Phone (3a)
71 × 1528.277.5 × 163.58.4
22Phone (3a)Difference
Height152 mm163.5 mm−11.5 mm
Width71 mm77.5 mm−6.5 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.4 mm−0.2 mm
Weight190 g201 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 22 better than Phone (3a)?

  1. AnTuTu score2,454,886 vs 828,4293×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,903 vs 3,2782.1×
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  4. Wired charging80 W vs 50 W+60%
  5. Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 3,000 nits2×
  6. Wireless chargingYes · Phone (3a): No
  7. Battery capacity5,510 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
  8. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  9. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
  10. Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
  11. CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+28%
  12. Pixel density465 ppi vs 387 ppi+20%

Why is Phone (3a) better than 22?

  1. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Meizu 22Meizu 22≈ $3909.4
Design
Weight190 g201 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.4 mm
Height152 mm163.5 mm
Width71 mm77.5 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP66IP64
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx4
Glass protection—Panda Glass
ColoursBlack, White, PinkBlack, White, Blue, Community Edition green
Display
Screen size6.3″6.8″
PanelLTPO OLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,200 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,670 px2,392 px
Pixel density465 ppi387 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness6,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,273 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.7%88%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.21 GHz2.5 GHz
GPUAdreno 825Adreno 810
AnTuTu score2,454,886828,429
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,9033,278
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,064
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.57"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×2×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,510 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—13.6 h
Wired charging80 W50 W
Charged in 30 min—79%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power66 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0/3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFlyme AIOS 2Nothing OS 4.0
Major OS updates promised—3
EU label
Energy class—C
Battery charge cycles—1,400
Endurance per cycle—44 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare