- android.gs
- Compare
- 21 vs Redmi K60 Pro
Meizu 21 vs Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
What 21 does better (11) and where Redmi K60 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display8.6
9.4Camera9.1
6.4Battery8.2
7.7Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
21Redmi K60 Pro
| 21 | Redmi K60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156.7 mm | 162.8 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 201 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 21 better than Redmi K60 Pro?
- Main camera200 MP vs 54 MP3.7×
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,400 nits+29%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K60 Pro: No
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 87.5%+2%
Why is Redmi K60 Pro better than 21?
- Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
- Wireless chargingNo · 21: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 156.7 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Purple, Green, White | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,710,757 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,979 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,624 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 54 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 158% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme 10.5 | MIUI 14 |
