- android.gs
- Compare
- 20 Pro vs Phantom X2 Pro
Meizu 20 Pro vs Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
What 20 Pro does better (12) and where Phantom X2 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display7.4
9.0Camera8.2
8.2Battery7.8
7.7Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
20 ProPhantom X2 Pro
| 20 Pro | Phantom X2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 72.7 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 201 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 20 Pro better than Phantom X2 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 500 nits3.6×
- Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Pixel density515 ppi vs 387 ppi+33%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 9 mm+15%
Why is Phantom X2 Pro better than 20 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Optical zoom2× vs 2.5×+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight209 g vs 201 g+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 93.3%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Gray, Gold, Silver | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 515 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 505 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 93.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 961,576 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,984 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 81% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme 10 | HiOS 8.6 |
