- android.gs
- Compare
- 20 Pro vs Moto G54 Power
Meizu 20 Pro vs Motorola Moto G54 Power
What 20 Pro does better (18) and where Moto G54 Power wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display5.8
9.0Camera8.0
8.2Battery7.3
7.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
20 ProMoto G54 Power
| 20 Pro | Moto G54 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 161.6 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 73.8 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 192 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 20 Pro better than Moto G54 Power?
- Wired charging80 W vs 33 W2.4×
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 560 nits3.2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- OLED panelYes · Moto G54 Power: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Moto G54 Power: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Moto G54 Power: No
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+45%
- Pixel density515 ppi vs 405 ppi+27%
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+5%
Why is Moto G54 Power better than 20 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Memory card slotNo · 20 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · 20 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 20 Pro: Yes
- Weight209 g vs 192 g+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 161.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Gray, Gold, Silver | Midnight Blue, Pearl Blue, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 515 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 560 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 489 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 85.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 432,772 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,918 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.9 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 45% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme 10 | Hello UI |
