- android.gs
- Compare
- 20 Infinity vs nubia Z50S Pro
Meizu 20 Infinity vs ZTE nubia Z50S Pro
What 20 Infinity does better (7) and where nubia Z50S Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.1
9.2Camera9.6
7.3Battery6.8
7.5Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
20 Infinitynubia Z50S Pro
| 20 Infinity | nubia Z50S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 163.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.3 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 228 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 20 Infinity better than nubia Z50S Pro?
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z50S Pro: No
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,200 nits+50%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Pixel density511 ppi vs 452 ppi+13%
- Weight215 g vs 228 g+6%
- Resolution (width)1,368 px vs 1,260 px+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Why is nubia Z50S Pro better than 20 Infinity?
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+6%
- Wired charging65 W vs 80 W+23%
- Optical zoom2.1× vs 3.3×+57%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+5%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 215 g | 228 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Gray, Green, Silver | Black, Khaki, Silver/White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,368 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,192 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 511 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 89.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.36 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,650,939 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,569 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.1× | 3.3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | — | 3.1 |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme 10 | MyOS 13 |
