- android.gs
- Compare
- 18 Pro vs X60 Pro+
Meizu 18 Pro vs Vivo X60 Pro+
What 18 Pro does better (10) and where X60 Pro+ wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
18 ProX60 Pro+
| 18 Pro | X60 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 158.6 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 73.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 9.1 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 191 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 18 Pro better than X60 Pro+?
- Wireless chargingYes · X60 Pro+: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X60 Pro+: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+7%
- Pixel density526 ppi vs 398 ppi+32%
- 4K selfie videoYes · X60 Pro+: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Selfie camera44 MP vs 32 MP+38%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 9.1 mm+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is X60 Pro+ better than 18 Pro?
- Wired charging40 W vs 55 W+38%
- Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 158.6 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Colours | Blue, White, Gray | Orange, Emperor Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 816 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 734,811 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,749 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 44 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Flyme 9 | Funtouch 12 (International) |
